Forecasting Tornadoes. Hunting Cancer Cures. Powered by Quantum Entropy.
- mansour ansari

- Jul 27
- 3 min read

Some of you have asked: How is it that I forecast tornadoes and floods before the local TV radar picks them up? Or more recently: Why am I now diving into cancer drug discovery like I’m looking for a molecular needle in a 200-million-compound haystack? And finally: What is all this quantum stuff, really?
Let me explain — because the answer is more real (and more urgent) than science fiction.
Over the past few years, I’ve built a quantum-powered simulation engine that draws directly from the chaotic, mysterious source code of the universe: quantum entropy. That same engine lets me detect early signs of tornado formation hours before classical models can visualize the risk. And now, with the same core system reconfigured, I’m turning it toward something even more personal — finding compounds that may one day help cure or halt cancer. So, note that every simulation you run needs a random number injection and my randomness is a layered quantum-randomness-generated entropy that unravels a lot of potential useful statistics that the standard PRNG simply ignores. Not that is bad seed, but my QRNG method looks into different area. Let me explain:
This isn’t just a data science project. It’s an AI-scaled, high-speed discovery system — sorting through billions of possibilities to surface the few molecules worth a second look. I’m not just injecting randomness into simulations. I’m injecting quantum-derived uncertainty — entropy harvested from real photonic events and quantum annealers — to trigger collapse behaviors that classical tools would miss. By quantum annealers, I am talking about the D-Wave Annealing quantum system, likely the most primal quantum computer.
By injecting QRNG vs PRNG in my small or large scale simulations:
In tornado forecasting, I’ve seen:
1 Early emergence of vorticity zones
2 Faster identification of cold air convergence
3 Collapse zones predicted 1–4 hours earlier than classical models
4 Symbolic patterns that compress atmospheric fields into Zaban glyphs, a quantum linguistic framework i am building
In drug discovery, quantum-seeded simulations:
1 Explore conformational states PRNGs rarely reach. It means classical simulation miss this part
2 Surface unlikely hydrogen bond geometries
3 Cross hidden energy thresholds that uncover novel binding sites
4 Reveal new compounds flagged not by score, but by symbolic resonance
These events are not noise. They’re patterns only visible when quantum entropy enters the equation. PRNGs miss them — not because they’re faulty, but because they aren’t bold enough to search where QRNG goes by default.
Soon, I’ll be opening the gates: a Citizen Scientist Portal where anyone — yes, even you, with a desktop or smartphone — can join the effort. We’ll search through curated “bins” of chemical space, running simulations and logging collapse patterns. You’ll be credited for your discoveries. And if a compound you helped simulate makes it to the lab… you’ll know.
But building this has taken time. Not hours. Thousands of hours. You need to be a product designer, systems engineer, data pipeline builder, cloud architect, coder, and — most of all — a stubborn optimist. Because it’s no small task to make something that can scale to millions of participants or analyze 200 million+ compounds reliably. Even with AI helping sort, rank, and tag output, the infrastructure beneath it all must be engineered like a mission-critical system.
To fully simulate the entire PubChem database even once, I’ll need at least 12,000 active participants. One full cycle could take months — and that’s assuming the architecture holds.
At the heart of it all is quantum physics — not fiction, but reality: collapse events, entanglement, and uncertainty made useful. I’ve built a working pipeline that takes raw quantum entropy and transforms it into actionable insight. Whether predicting a storm... or simulating a molecule binding to a cancer-driving protein... the engine is the same.
Stay tuned.




Comments